Thursday, March 31, 2011

New Phone! ;)

P99

Ok, I did it...and my Craigslisted iPhone 4 is simply splendid!

My poor old phone was limping through life and little Waldo 2.0 is safely retired to his old box. His screen was cracked...in 5 places and had no molding left. The touch screen didn't work except by switching it from landscape to portrait for each letter typed. The back casing was cracked down the middle, and had a chunk missing. It went swimming...twice. It wouldn't go on vibrate. The camera hasn't worked for a year. It wouldn't change from the voicemail screen to call people. It wouldn't hold much charge, and would die without warning.

All hail the trusty phone that withstood years of travel, adventure and accidental abuse!

The fact that Waldo 3.0 types without having to flip my phone around is reason enough to spend the $360.

Huzzah!

Sunday, March 6, 2011

War Horse in the West End - Here's the trailer for the production...very cool!

"War Horse" Life-sized Puppet (Thanks to Allen Beuershausen for sharing!)

Drifting rubber duckies chart oceans of plastic

PARIS

Theirs is an epic tale of resilience and pluck, a seafarer's yarn of high-seas adventure that has seen them brave some of the world's wildest waters in their 11-year odyssey from the Pacific Ocean toward landfall in Europe.

They have bobbed through storms that would have wrecked larger vessels, to drift deliberately down the Bering Strait. They have patiently borne a four-year spell trapped in Arctic ice packs, to float freely into the Atlantic.

And now, buoyed perhaps by the prospect of an end to their pelagic paddling, a flotilla of yellow bathtub rubber ducks, lost at sea when they fell off a container ship in the North Pacific in 1992, is about to wash up on Europe's western shores, according to an oceanographer who has been tracking them for years.

More of the much-traveled toys are thought to be heading down the Eastern Seaboard of the United States, where their arrival would offer new data on ocean currents and wind patterns. And the US company that made the ducks is offering $100 in savings bonds to anyone who finds one.

Nobody has actually seen one of these ducks in the Atlantic yet, says Curt Ebbesmeyer, a retired oceanographer and the international dean of beachcombers, who has put out a global call for sightings. But their presence there "is a prediction based on the drifts of thousands of other objects in my files," he says.

The plastic ducks were part of a consignment of 29,000 bathtub toys, including beavers, turtles, and frogs, that ended up in the Pacific when a container ship en route from China to the United States lost some of its deck cargo in heavy seas.

An Alaskan landing

A number of the critters ended up on the beaches of Alaska, but from those latitudes there is only one way out of the Pacific - through the Bering Strait, past towering icebergs and the curious gaze of walruses, around the northern coast of Greenland, and into the Atlantic.

Some marine experts, including Capt. Charles Moore, founder of the Algalita Marine Research Foundation in California, doubt there is anything of the wandering waterfowl left to be found after 11 years. And Captain Moore knows a thing or two about the subject: He describes himself as having "dedicated his time and resources to understanding and remediating the ocean 's plastic load."

"I think it's a bit of a fraud to suggest they are going to find ducks in a whole duck shape," he says. More likely, he adds, the flock has broken up into fragments. "If anyone finds a whole duck, it will be very brittle," he predicts. "They may have to glue it together to claim their reward."

But if the ducks - sold by The First Years, of Avon, Mass. - are as sturdy as their friends the beavers, that may not be the case. Last weekend, at a beachcombers' fair in Sitka, Alaska, Mr. Ebbesmeyer said a boy showed him a sun-bleached beaver he had found nearby just the other week.

"It was quite pliable, just faded," says Ebbesmeyer, who lives in Seattle. "The amazing thing about these toys is that they are very hardy."

Computer models of ocean currents and wind directions developed by a friend of Ebbesmeyer's, Jim Ingraham, accurately predicted the arrival of the ducks off the Washington State coast in 1995, after they had been round the Pacific's circular current three times, in a 45,000 mile journey.

Page: 1 | 2 Next Page

Friendly Floatees - The rubber duckies who traveled the ocean!

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Route taken by the Friendly Floatees initially lost in the Pacific Ocean in 1992.

Oceanographer Curtis Ebbesmeyer with flotsam (including some Friendly Floatees) that he observes to monitor ocean currents.

Friendly Floatees are plastic bath toys marketed by The First Years, Inc. and made famous by the work of Curtis Ebbesmeyer, an oceanographer who models ocean currents on the basis of flotsam movements including those of a consignment of Friendly Floatees washed into the Pacific Ocean in 1992.

Contents

[hide]

[edit] Oceanography

A consignment of Friendly Floatee toys, manufactured in China for The First Years Inc., departed from Hong Kong on a container ship destined for Tacoma, Washington, U.S.. On 10 January 1992, during a storm in the North Pacific Ocean close to the International Date Line, twelve 40-foot (13.3 m) intermodal containers were washed overboard. One of these containers held 28,800 Floatees,[1] a child's bath toy which came in a number of forms: red beavers, green frogs, blue turtles and yellow ducks. At some point, the container opened (possibly due to collision with other containers or the ship itself) and the Floatees were released. Although each toy was mounted in a plastic housing attached to a backing card, subsequent tests showed that the cardboard quickly degraded in sea water allowing the Floatees to escape. Unlike many bath toys, Friendly Floatees have no holes in them so they do not take on water.

Seattle oceanographers Curtis Ebbesmeyer and James Ingraham, who were working on an ocean surface current model, began to track their progress. The mass release of 28,800 objects into the ocean at one time offered significant advantages over the standard method of releasing 500–1000 drift bottles. The recovery rate of objects from the Pacific Ocean is typically around 2%, so rather than the 10 to 20 recoveries typically seen with a drift bottle release, the two scientists expected numbers closer to 600. They were already tracking various other spills of flotsam, including 61,000 Nike running shoes that had been lost overboard in 1990.

Ten months after the incident, the first Floatees began to wash up along the Alaskan coast. The first discovery consisted of ten toys found by a beachcomber near Sitka, Alaska on 16 November 1992, about 2,000 miles (3,200 km) from their starting point. Ebbesmeyer and Ingraham contacted beachcombers, coastal workers, and local residents to locate hundreds of the beached Floatees over a 530 mile (850 km) shoreline. Another beachcomber discovered twenty of the toys on 28 November 1992, and in total 400 were found along the eastern coast of the Gulf of Alaska in the period up to August 1993. This represented a 1.4% recovery rate. The landfalls were logged in Ingraham's computer model OSCUR (Ocean Surface Currents Simulation), which uses measurements of air pressure from 1967 onwards to calculate the direction of and speed of wind across the oceans, and the consequent surface currents. Ingraham's model was built to help fisheries but it is also used to predict flotsam movements or the likely locations of those lost at sea.

Using the models they had developed, the oceanographers correctly predicted further landfalls of the toys in Washington state in 1996 and theorized that many of the remaining Floatees would have travelled to Alaska, westward to Japan, back to Alaska, and then drifted northwards through the Bering Strait and become trapped in the Arctic pack ice. Moving slowly with the ice across the Pole, they predicted it would take five or six years for the toys to reach the North Atlantic where the ice would thaw and release them. Between July and December 2003, The First Years Inc. offered a $100 US savings bond reward to anybody who recovered a Floatee in New England, Canada or Iceland. More of the toys were recovered in 2004 than in any of the preceding three years. However, still more of these toys were predicted to have headed eastward past Greenland and make landfall on the southwestern shores of the United Kingdom in 2007. In July 2007, a retired teacher found a plastic duck on the Devon coast, and British newspapers mistakenly announced that the Floatees had begun to arrive.[2][3] But the day after breaking the story, the Western Morning News, the local Devon newspaper, reported that Dr. Simon Boxall of the National Oceanography Centre in Southampton had examined the specimen and determined that the duck was not in fact a Floatee.[4]

Bleached by sun and seawater, the ducks and beavers had faded to white, but the turtles and frogs had kept their original colours.

Two children's books have been written about the ducks, and the toys themselves have become collector's items, fetching prices as high as $1,000.

[edit] See also

[edit] References

[edit] External links

Why Chinese Mothers Are Superior - Your thoughts?

By AMY CHUA

A lot of people wonder how Chinese parents raise such stereotypically successful kids. They wonder what these parents do to produce so many math whizzes and music prodigies, what it's like inside the family, and whether they could do it too. Well, I can tell them, because I've done it. Here are some things my daughters, Sophia and Louisa, were never allowed to do:

Erin Patrice O'Brien for The Wall Street Journal

Amy Chua with her daughters, Louisa and Sophia, at their home in New Haven, Conn.

CAU cover

CAU cover

• attend a sleepover

• have a playdate

• be in a school play

• complain about not being in a school play

• watch TV or play computer games

• choose their own extracurricular activities

• get any grade less than an A

• not be the No. 1 student in every subject except gym and drama

• play any instrument other than the piano or violin

• not play the piano or violin.

I'm using the term "Chinese mother" loosely. I know some Korean, Indian, Jamaican, Irish and Ghanaian parents who qualify too. Conversely, I know some mothers of Chinese heritage, almost always born in the West, who are not Chinese mothers, by choice or otherwise. I'm also using the term "Western parents" loosely. Western parents come in all varieties.

All the same, even when Western parents think they're being strict, they usually don't come close to being Chinese mothers. For example, my Western friends who consider themselves strict make their children practice their instruments 30 minutes every day. An hour at most. For a Chinese mother, the first hour is the easy part. It's hours two and three that get tough.

When it comes to parenting, the Chinese seem to produce children who display academic excellence, musical mastery and professional success - or so the stereotype goes. WSJ's Christina Tsuei speaks to two moms raised by Chinese immigrants who share what it was like growing up and how they hope to raise their children.

Despite our squeamishness about cultural stereotypes, there are tons of studies out there showing marked and quantifiable differences between Chinese and Westerners when it comes to parenting. In one study of 50 Western American mothers and 48 Chinese immigrant mothers, almost 70% of the Western mothers said either that "stressing academic success is not good for children" or that "parents need to foster the idea that learning is fun." By contrast, roughly 0% of the Chinese mothers felt the same way. Instead, the vast majority of the Chinese mothers said that they believe their children can be "the best" students, that "academic achievement reflects successful parenting," and that if children did not excel at school then there was "a problem" and parents "were not doing their job." Other studies indicate that compared to Western parents, Chinese parents spend approximately 10 times as long every day drilling academic activities with their children. By contrast, Western kids are more likely to participate in sports teams.

Journal Community

What Chinese parents understand is that nothing is fun until you're good at it. To get good at anything you have to work, and children on their own never want to work, which is why it is crucial to override their preferences. This often requires fortitude on the part of the parents because the child will resist; things are always hardest at the beginning, which is where Western parents tend to give up. But if done properly, the Chinese strategy produces a virtuous circle. Tenacious practice, practice, practice is crucial for excellence; rote repetition is underrated in America. Once a child starts to excel at something—whether it's math, piano, pitching or ballet—he or she gets praise, admiration and satisfaction. This builds confidence and makes the once not-fun activity fun. This in turn makes it easier for the parent to get the child to work even more.

Chinese parents can get away with things that Western parents can't. Once when I was young—maybe more than once—when I was extremely disrespectful to my mother, my father angrily called me "garbage" in our native Hokkien dialect. It worked really well. I felt terrible and deeply ashamed of what I had done. But it didn't damage my self-esteem or anything like that. I knew exactly how highly he thought of me. I didn't actually think I was worthless or feel like a piece of garbage.

Chua family

From Ms. Chua's album: 'Mean me with Lulu in hotel room... with score taped to TV!'

chau inside

chau inside

As an adult, I once did the same thing to Sophia, calling her garbage in English when she acted extremely disrespectfully toward me. When I mentioned that I had done this at a dinner party, I was immediately ostracized. One guest named Marcy got so upset she broke down in tears and had to leave early. My friend Susan, the host, tried to rehabilitate me with the remaining guests.

The fact is that Chinese parents can do things that would seem unimaginable—even legally actionable—to Westerners. Chinese mothers can say to their daughters, "Hey fatty—lose some weight." By contrast, Western parents have to tiptoe around the issue, talking in terms of "health" and never ever mentioning the f-word, and their kids still end up in therapy for eating disorders and negative self-image. (I also once heard a Western father toast his adult daughter by calling her "beautiful and incredibly competent." She later told me that made her feel like garbage.)

Chinese parents can order their kids to get straight As. Western parents can only ask their kids to try their best. Chinese parents can say, "You're lazy. All your classmates are getting ahead of you." By contrast, Western parents have to struggle with their own conflicted feelings about achievement, and try to persuade themselves that they're not disappointed about how their kids turned out.

I've thought long and hard about how Chinese parents can get away with what they do. I think there are three big differences between the Chinese and Western parental mind-sets.

[chau inside] Chua family

Newborn Amy Chua in her mother's arms, a year after her parents arrived in the U.S.

First, I've noticed that Western parents are extremely anxious about their children's self-esteem. They worry about how their children will feel if they fail at something, and they constantly try to reassure their children about how good they are notwithstanding a mediocre performance on a test or at a recital. In other words, Western parents are concerned about their children's psyches. Chinese parents aren't. They assume strength, not fragility, and as a result they behave very differently.

For example, if a child comes home with an A-minus on a test, a Western parent will most likely praise the child. The Chinese mother will gasp in horror and ask what went wrong. If the child comes home with a B on the test, some Western parents will still praise the child. Other Western parents will sit their child down and express disapproval, but they will be careful not to make their child feel inadequate or insecure, and they will not call their child "stupid," "worthless" or "a disgrace." Privately, the Western parents may worry that their child does not test well or have aptitude in the subject or that there is something wrong with the curriculum and possibly the whole school. If the child's grades do not improve, they may eventually schedule a meeting with the school principal to challenge the way the subject is being taught or to call into question the teacher's credentials.

If a Chinese child gets a B—which would never happen—there would first be a screaming, hair-tearing explosion. The devastated Chinese mother would then get dozens, maybe hundreds of practice tests and work through them with her child for as long as it takes to get the grade up to an A.

Chinese parents demand perfect grades because they believe that their child can get them. If their child doesn't get them, the Chinese parent assumes it's because the child didn't work hard enough. That's why the solution to substandard performance is always to excoriate, punish and shame the child. The Chinese parent believes that their child will be strong enough to take the shaming and to improve from it. (And when Chinese kids do excel, there is plenty of ego-inflating parental praise lavished in the privacy of the home.)

Chua family

Sophia playing at Carnegie Hall in 2007.

chau inside

chau inside

Second, Chinese parents believe that their kids owe them everything. The reason for this is a little unclear, but it's probably a combination of Confucian filial piety and the fact that the parents have sacrificed and done so much for their children. (And it's true that Chinese mothers get in the trenches, putting in long grueling hours personally tutoring, training, interrogating and spying on their kids.) Anyway, the understanding is that Chinese children must spend their lives repaying their parents by obeying them and making them proud.

By contrast, I don't think most Westerners have the same view of children being permanently indebted to their parents. My husband, Jed, actually has the opposite view. "Children don't choose their parents," he once said to me. "They don't even choose to be born. It's parents who foist life on their kids, so it's the parents' responsibility to provide for them. Kids don't owe their parents anything. Their duty will be to their own kids." This strikes me as a terrible deal for the Western parent.

Third, Chinese parents believe that they know what is best for their children and therefore override all of their children's own desires and preferences. That's why Chinese daughters can't have boyfriends in high school and why Chinese kids can't go to sleepaway camp. It's also why no Chinese kid would ever dare say to their mother, "I got a part in the school play! I'm Villager Number Six. I'll have to stay after school for rehearsal every day from 3:00 to 7:00, and I'll also need a ride on weekends." God help any Chinese kid who tried that one.

Don't get me wrong: It's not that Chinese parents don't care about their children. Just the opposite. They would give up anything for their children. It's just an entirely different parenting model.

Here's a story in favor of coercion, Chinese-style. Lulu was about 7, still playing two instruments, and working on a piano piece called "The Little White Donkey" by the French composer Jacques Ibert. The piece is really cute—you can just imagine a little donkey ambling along a country road with its master—but it's also incredibly difficult for young players because the two hands have to keep schizophrenically different rhythms.

Lulu couldn't do it. We worked on it nonstop for a week, drilling each of her hands separately, over and over. But whenever we tried putting the hands together, one always morphed into the other, and everything fell apart. Finally, the day before her lesson, Lulu announced in exasperation that she was giving up and stomped off.

"Get back to the piano now," I ordered.

"You can't make me."

"Oh yes, I can."

Back at the piano, Lulu made me pay. She punched, thrashed and kicked. She grabbed the music score and tore it to shreds. I taped the score back together and encased it in a plastic shield so that it could never be destroyed again. Then I hauled Lulu's dollhouse to the car and told her I'd donate it to the Salvation Army piece by piece if she didn't have "The Little White Donkey" perfect by the next day. When Lulu said, "I thought you were going to the Salvation Army, why are you still here?" I threatened her with no lunch, no dinner, no Christmas or Hanukkah presents, no birthday parties for two, three, four years. When she still kept playing it wrong, I told her she was purposely working herself into a frenzy because she was secretly afraid she couldn't do it. I told her to stop being lazy, cowardly, self-indulgent and pathetic.

Jed took me aside. He told me to stop insulting Lulu—which I wasn't even doing, I was just motivating her—and that he didn't think threatening Lulu was helpful. Also, he said, maybe Lulu really just couldn't do the technique—perhaps she didn't have the coordination yet—had I considered that possibility?

"You just don't believe in her," I accused.

"That's ridiculous," Jed said scornfully. "Of course I do."

"Sophia could play the piece when she was this age."

"But Lulu and Sophia are different people," Jed pointed out.

"Oh no, not this," I said, rolling my eyes. "Everyone is special in their special own way," I mimicked sarcastically. "Even losers are special in their own special way. Well don't worry, you don't have to lift a finger. I'm willing to put in as long as it takes, and I'm happy to be the one hated. And you can be the one they adore because you make them pancakes and take them to Yankees games."

I rolled up my sleeves and went back to Lulu. I used every weapon and tactic I could think of. We worked right through dinner into the night, and I wouldn't let Lulu get up, not for water, not even to go to the bathroom. The house became a war zone, and I lost my voice yelling, but still there seemed to be only negative progress, and even I began to have doubts.

Then, out of the blue, Lulu did it. Her hands suddenly came together—her right and left hands each doing their own imperturbable thing—just like that.

Lulu realized it the same time I did. I held my breath. She tried it tentatively again. Then she played it more confidently and faster, and still the rhythm held. A moment later, she was beaming.

"Mommy, look—it's easy!" After that, she wanted to play the piece over and over and wouldn't leave the piano. That night, she came to sleep in my bed, and we snuggled and hugged, cracking each other up. When she performed "The Little White Donkey" at a recital a few weeks later, parents came up to me and said, "What a perfect piece for Lulu—it's so spunky and so her."

Even Jed gave me credit for that one. Western parents worry a lot about their children's self-esteem. But as a parent, one of the worst things you can do for your child's self-esteem is to let them give up. On the flip side, there's nothing better for building confidence than learning you can do something you thought you couldn't.

There are all these new books out there portraying Asian mothers as scheming, callous, overdriven people indifferent to their kids' true interests. For their part, many Chinese secretly believe that they care more about their children and are willing to sacrifice much more for them than Westerners, who seem perfectly content to let their children turn out badly. I think it's a misunderstanding on both sides. All decent parents want to do what's best for their children. The Chinese just have a totally different idea of how to do that.

Western parents try to respect their children's individuality, encouraging them to pursue their true passions, supporting their choices, and providing positive reinforcement and a nurturing environment. By contrast, the Chinese believe that the best way to protect their children is by preparing them for the future, letting them see what they're capable of, and arming them with skills, work habits and inner confidence that no one can ever take away.

—Amy Chua is a professor at Yale Law School and author of "Day of Empire" and "World on Fire: How Exporting Free Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic Hatred and Global Instability." This essay is excerpted from "Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother" by Amy Chua, to be published Tuesday by the Penguin Press, a member of Penguin Group (USA) Inc. Copyright © 2011 by Amy Chua.

National Headache Foundation Migraine Diet - Meh, I eat all the wrong things. Time to change the diet.

<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

National Headache Foundation Migraine Diet - Meh, I eat all the wrong things. Time to change the diet.

<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

Saturday, March 5, 2011

You Are Not a Photographer

March 06, 2011
Mary Anne: &#8220;The only part of this picture that says &#8220;Senior&#8221; to me is the text. The rest of it reads middle-aged guy on vacation.&#8221;  Ginger: &#8220;I can appreciate the from the back shot if it&#8217;s done right, THIS is not  one of those times. &nbsp;As a SENIOR picture this has disaster written all  over it. You would definitely have to have your name embossed on the  wallets you passed out to friends and family or nobody would have a clue  who you were. This shot might have been saveable if maybe we could have  at least seen his profile!&#8221;

Mary Anne: “The only part of this picture that says “Senior” to me is the text. The rest of it reads middle-aged guy on vacation.”

Ginger: “I can appreciate the from the back shot if it’s done right, THIS is not one of those times.  As a SENIOR picture this has disaster written all over it. You would definitely have to have your name embossed on the wallets you passed out to friends and family or nobody would have a clue who you were. This shot might have been saveable if maybe we could have at least seen his profile!”


Share/Bookmark

You Are Not a Photographer

March 05, 2011

Comment Fail

As a “pro,” she kinda asked for it. From an observant reader. 

Mistie May…commenter, or your next post?

In browsing the comments, I noticed Mistie McDonald has a LOT to say about other photographers…but when she commented that the angel wings/ultrasound shot could be “done right” I raised an eyebrow.  I present to you her facebook page (linked by way of her comments).  You’re welcome.

https://www.facebook.com/mistiemaystudios

Remember the ultrasound-superimposed-on-a-woman-with-angel-wings-belly picture? It should never “be done.”



Share/Bookmark

Comment Fail

March 04, 2011
Excuse the lack of snark (or maybe you&#8217;re welcome for the lack of snark), was just sent this and had to share.

Excuse the lack of snark (or maybe you’re welcome for the lack of snark), was just sent this and had to share.


Share/Bookmark

You Are Not a Photographer

March 04, 2011

From our comments: “When it comes to wedding photos, nobody can beat the Russians.” This is so bad that it’s pretty much awesome at the same time. 


Share/Bookmark

You Are Not a Photographer

March 04, 2011
Ginger: &#8220;If you can&#8217;t tell that it&#8217;s a belly bump YOU ARE DOING IT WRONG!!! I&#8217;m fairly certain that if I were pregnant I could take better belly bump pictures of myself in my bathroom with my eyes closed.&#8221;  Mary Anne: &#8220;I agree with Ginger, the classic self-portrait in front of the bathroom mirror baby bump pictures are better than these. Horrible unflattering angles. That poor momma-to-be must want to burn these.&#8221;

Ginger: “If you can’t tell that it’s a belly bump YOU ARE DOING IT WRONG!!! I’m fairly certain that if I were pregnant I could take better belly bump pictures of myself in my bathroom with my eyes closed.”

Mary Anne: “I agree with Ginger, the classic self-portrait in front of the bathroom mirror baby bump pictures are better than these. Horrible unflattering angles. That poor momma-to-be must want to burn these.”


Share/Bookmark

You Are Not a Photographer

March 03, 2011

Hate Mail

“Ok, well what’s going so wrong in your life that YOU have nothing better to do than troll the internet picking at what other people choose to do with their days? If you don’t like it, and you want them to feel bad that they’re making fun of people, DON’T FREAKIN’ LOOK! Go somewhere else, there ARE other sites to fill your days. You’re wasting everybodies time.”

Everybodies is not a word. It’s bothering me so I’ve decided to officially kick off our hate mail section. Perhaps a list of commonly misspelled hate mail words is in order?

Also, can we talk for a minute about the grammar some “professionals” use on photo business fan pages?

Tags: Hate Mail


Share/Bookmark

Hate Mail

March 03, 2011
If you advertise photography services, a photo might be nice. I guess if you&#8217;re only charging a $15 sitting fee, you can&#8217;t afford to take the time to upload a photo.&nbsp;    // ]]]]>]]>

If you advertise photography services, a photo might be nice. I guess if you’re only charging a $15 sitting fee, you can’t afford to take the time to upload a photo. 


Share/Bookmark

You Are Not a Photographer

March 02, 2011

“All it takes is a digital camera some editing software and a shop light from Home Depot and You are a Professional Photographer too!”


Share/Bookmark

You Are Not a Photographer

March 02, 2011
Ginger: &#8220;Just because you CAN do things in Photoshop doesn&#8217;t mean that you SHOULD. I personally find this photo a little disturbing and am really not okay with the angel wings. I thought that storks delivered babies, I wasn&#8217;t aware that angels were now delivering the babies.&#8221;  Mary Anne: &#8220;I get it. She&#8217;s pregnant with Skeletor and has a transparent stomach. So obvious.&#8221;&nbsp;

Ginger: “Just because you CAN do things in Photoshop doesn’t mean that you SHOULD. I personally find this photo a little disturbing and am really not okay with the angel wings. I thought that storks delivered babies, I wasn’t aware that angels were now delivering the babies.”

Mary Anne: “I get it. She’s pregnant with Skeletor and has a transparent stomach. So obvious.” 


Share/Bookmark

You Are Not a Photographer

March 02, 2011
Ginger and I have been rolling on the floor laughing since we opened our email to this. If you use PRO in all caps in the same breath as saying your client picks up her own pictures at Wal-Mart AND manage to misspell copyright, you might want to rethink your photography career.&nbsp;    ]]>

Ginger and I have been rolling on the floor laughing since we opened our email to this. If you use PRO in all caps in the same breath as saying your client picks up her own pictures at Wal-Mart AND manage to misspell copyright, you might want to rethink your photography career. 


Share/Bookmark

You Are Not a Photographer

Friday, March 4, 2011

Emilie Gossiaux And Alan Lundgard: Love Brings Healing For Student Hit By Semi Truck

When 21-year-old art student Emilie Gossiaux set out on her bike one fall morning in Brooklyn, she expected to arrive at her internship -- not a hospital bed.

Gossiaux was struck by an 18-wheel semi truck and suffered brain damage, a stroke and fractures of her head, leg and pelvis. She was rushed to the hospital.

For weeks, her devoted mother and father -- and boyfriend Alan Lundgard -- took shifts waiting by Gossiaux's bedside. She was mostly unresponsive, but they refused to give up, they told WNYC's Radiolab in a recent interview.

Once her condition was stabilized, doctors said she wasn't eligible to be moved to a rehabilitation program because she couldn't respond to commands. Her eyes wouldn't follow visual stimuli and she'd been hearing impaired since childhood.

Without a chance at rehabilitation, Gossiaux would be left at a nursing home with little chance of recovery.

Lundgard believed the woman he loved would come back to him. He turned to the Internet to read up on Helen Keller.

Keller's story inspired him. In the wee hours of the night, waiting by her bedside, he decided to replicate the method of communication Keller's teacher used: spelling words on her palm.

Advertisement

He wrote: I LOVE U.

Immediately, Gossiaux responded.

Excitedly, Lundgard documented her words, using his cell phone to record their interactions as she answered question after question.

Finally, he had the proof he needed to show the doctors Gossiaux could go to rehabilitation and had a chance at recovery.

LISTEN:


(audio originally from Radiolab.org)

Gossiaux is now recovering at New York's Rusk Institute. She has lost her sight, but can still hear with the use of the hearing aids she's worn most of her life.

Despite her blindness, she plans to continue to make art. Her hands, not her eyes, will dictate her creations now.

Faced with overwhelming medical bills, Gossiaux is accepting donations online on EmilieGossiaux.com to help cover the bills. So far, over $40,000 has been raised -- out of her total goal of $200,000.

Supporters can learn more about Emilie and make a donation to help her on her website.

Get HuffPost Impact On Twitter and Facebook! --> Know something we don't? E-mail us at impact@huffingtonpost.com -->

FOLLOW HUFFPOST IMPACT
ON
Facebook:

2K

Follow us on Facebook
Get updates from HuffPost posted directly to your News Feed.

'; var coords = [-5, -72]; // display fb-bubble FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, 'top', {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: 'clear-overlay'}); });

Twitter:

YouTube Mix for Vitamin String Quartet - Here is the soundtrack for your day!

Artist Biography


The Vitamin String Quartet is a group of Los Angeles-based studio musicians who have carved out a unique niche for themselves, recording new versions of songs by well-known rock, pop, and country a...
View full bio »
Vitamin String Quartet
Play all Add to

Videos by Vitamin String Quartet


Released in 2010


Released in 2009


Released in 2008


Released in 2005


Released in 2004


Released in 2003


Released in 2002



Show all videos »

Artist Biography


The Vitamin String Quartet is a group of Los Angeles-based studio musicians who have carved out a unique niche for themselves, recording new versions of songs by well-known rock, pop, and country artists, arranged for a small string ensemble. The Vitamin String Quartet have released well over 100 albums (through their own Vitamin Records label), most of which feature the songs of a single artist (and in some cases interpret a single album in full), though the group has also released thematic collections based on a particular mood, style, or genre. The quartet's membership is flexible, but violinist and arranger Tom Tally has been a significant contributor to the group, having produced and arranged 35 of their albums. In 2009, the Vitamin String Quartet took a creative step forward with their album Per_Versions, which along with tunes from a number of alternative pop groups, included several original compositions,